Osiris

The relatively high compensation reflects the responsibility, scrutiny, and reduced privacy and anonymity associated with the role. It is also intended to reduce incentives for bribery and corruption. Household allowances provide additional support for Councillors with partners or children. These form part of the Councillor’s remuneration, rather than salaries or automatic official positions for their relatives. Councillors can use specially secured public housing near relevant government sites, contributing towards ordinary accommodation costs. Homes accommodate different household requirements, including disabilities and larger families, and range from houses to spacious apartments in dedicated residential blocks. They are generally larger than ordinary homes, providing an additional incentive to accept the burdens of office and use accommodation that reduces security and transport costs. Councillors may instead remain in their existing homes, with necessary security alterations publicly funded.

Ordinary personal expenditure, including food, clothing, utilities, household services, and private leisure, is paid from the Councillor’s own income. Security-vetted services, such as cleaners, are available at subsidised rates comparable to ordinary civilian alternatives. The subsidy covers the additional requirements associated with serving protected officials, allowing Councillors to purchase these services without bearing an exceptional security premium. Official duties and their necessary costs are publicly funded. This includes additional childcare or family transport required by an official engagement. During private travel, the Councillor pays the equivalent ordinary travel cost, while public funds cover the additional expense of required protection or secure transport. Private accommodation, entertainment, guests’ discretionary expenses, and other personal holiday costs remain their responsibility. Published expense rules and independent auditing govern these distinctions, with reporting subject to necessary privacy and security protections.

Support continues after service. Former Councillors receive a small pension even if they successfully return to employment, alongside a sizeable transition income that tapers over time and assistance returning to ordinary work. Those who can demonstrate that their former public role has materially impaired their employment prospects may qualify for a substantially larger pension, although still well below serving Councillors’ remuneration. Necessary protection continues according to assessed threats. Access to vetted government services remains available until civilian services are considered safe and appropriate, which usually occurs within a few months of leaving office.

People are usually fairly relaxed about meeting celebrities in public. Saying hello or asking for a photo is normal enough, but someone who declines is generally left alone. There’s a strong expectation that celebrities should be able to go about their lives without being followed, harassed, or treated as though they owe strangers their time. Fans can take an interest in personal details someone willingly shares, and journalists can still investigate misconduct or other matters of public concern. Ordinary privacy and personal boundaries remain important. Fame can pay very well. Successful celebrities may earn many times the median income, with their unusual position, public exposure, and loss of anonymity helping justify that compensation. There is still an upper limit, beyond which almost everything earned is collected through the Republic’s tax arrangements. Alongside the wider rules governing ownership and finance, this allows celebrities to live very comfortably while limiting the wealth they could accumulate and use to gain economic power.

Celebrity advertising follows the same requirement as other advertising: it has to give people useful information about the product or service. A celebrity can explain or demonstrate something, but their fame or endorsement cannot be the main reason offered for buying it. The organisation hiring them must provide clear, reasonable guidance on which claims and demonstrations are legally permitted. They remain free to criticise the product. If inadequate guidance leads to an advertising violation, the organisation can be held responsible. If the guidance was adequate and the celebrity disregarded it, responsibility may instead fall on them. Celebrities also take part in politics and public debate, although being well known generally gives their opinions little extra authority outside their own field. Civics education includes schoolwork on celebrity influence, advertising, and parasocial relationships, encouraging people to consider someone’s evidence and expertise. Younger or vulnerable audiences, and people strongly attached to a particular celebrity, can still give their opinions disproportionate weight. The Republic’s wider aversion to personal rule also makes personality cults around politicians particularly poorly regarded. Most celebrities are still human. Artificial musicians, presenters, performers, and online personalities make up a smaller but noticeable part of the scene, with their artificial nature made clear to audiences. They can develop recognisable personalities and devoted followings, with fans taking an interest in both the character and the creative work behind it. The organisations operating them follow the same expectations around advertising and transparency as those working with human celebrities.

Healthcare and education are free, as are basic internet and communications. Groceries, electricity, and water are subsidised. Ordinary public transport is also free, including long-distance journeys by train, ferry, metro, or bus, so getting around doesn’t usually require owning a car or setting aside money for fares. Air travel with a viable cleaner alternative is charged normally, with targeted assistance where appropriate. Public sports, cultural, and community programs also make it possible to have an active social life and pursue interests without spending much.

Housing contributions are linked to income, with reduced rates for people on low incomes that can fall to zero where their money is needed for other essentials. These reductions can build up a deferred housing balance, but repayment comes from later contributions above maintenance and administration costs. It therefore delays the accumulation of savings towards buying a home, rather than creating a bill that competes with groceries or other necessities. Once that balance is cleared, surplus contributions go into the resident’s housing savings account.

Someone with no earned income would still have the general automation dividend and any welfare support relevant to their circumstances. That generally allows a secure life, participation in ordinary social activities, and some room for hobbies and personal spending. Replacing everyday belongings is an expected part of the budget, although someone relying on general provision would usually choose standard products and might put up with an irritating fault for longer before replacing something. Expensive extra features would require more consideration and saving. An ordinary earned income gives people much more flexibility over those choices. They can replace something sooner, choose additional features they value, spend more on their interests, and save more readily. Together with the Republic’s shorter working weeks, this means a comfortable life generally leaves people time and money to enjoy it. Higher incomes and substantial savings mainly expand access to luxuries, such as frequent overseas travel, expensive imported goods, or particularly elaborate hobbies.

Larger or especially desirable homes are a more nuanced case. Rental eligibility depends on household needs, preferences, and allocation rules, so a single renter couldn’t realistically obtain a large family home simply because they preferred having several spare rooms. Buying can provide more freedom where supply permits it. If housing planners expect a reasonable surplus of large homes after meeting household needs, people who don’t need that much space can become eligible to buy one for their own use. Earning and saving can therefore widen someone’s housing choices, while the priority remains ensuring suitable homes are available to households that need them.

if I want to really go to Spain and study and or stay here. Or join the National guard or army to help pay my college debts for these education institutions.
We the people deserve
an entirely free subsidized education throughout any education.

For the past 3 years nearly I have been not doing any of that stupid pledge of allegiance stuff.
Since to be frank it does not feel like it is for the people
currently, I will not kneel to a flag representing a country not for the people, full of old business men posing as "good politicians".
On the ground though the United States is fine and we
somehow have no public protests, I would think yes due to how the political climate is here right now.

I support the French youth protests as a youth of America currently. If
the time calls at the right time I will rise to make society better.
Having a multi day protest instead of for some nice afternoon would be a relief.
For a protest to be successful it must give a noticeable burden to the economy, that corporations can't make up in an hour.
They would use a fundraiser to raise money to pay all missed wages to make it possible. I am progressive. I want to live in a big city someday.