NATION

PASSWORD

3

DispatchBulletinCampaign

by The Federation of URA World Assembly Affairs. . 32 reads.

URA Recommendation: Vote AGAINST "Drug Decriminalization Act"


URA World Assembly Recommendation

Drug Decriminalization Act
The General Assembly,

Understanding that punitive efforts against recreational drug use have failed,

Aware that the decriminalization of recreational drug possession and targeted rehabilitation and social programs have been demonstrated to decrease the negative societal effects associated with substance abuse,

Noting that recreational drug possession charges are a favored tool of legal authorities and governments seeking to marginalize or suppress minorities and political opposition to their governments,

Further noting that nations with rampant corruption within law enforcement authorities are often empowered by the continued criminalization of recreational drug possession to commit violence and other indignities against even non-marginalized demographics,

Unconvinced that the criminalization of individuals in possession of recreational drugs deters recidivism or recreational drug use,

Concluding that the criminalization of recreational drug possession and its resulting consequences for both those truly in possession of such drugs and those falsely accused represents both a grave injustice towards human dignity and a waste of a nation's expenditure,

Hereby:

  1. Defines for the purposes of this resolution;

    1. "drug" as a chemical substance which induces psychoactive effects after being consumed, where such a substance is not already considered legal for recreational consumption or a substance used for recognized medical purposes or otherwise as part of recognized sacramental purposes,

    2. "simple drug possession" as the possession of drugs by an individual where such possession is not for the purposes of:

      1. monetary or other forms of material gain or

      2. providing drugs to an individual without their consent or otherwise with malicious intent,

    3. "illicit drug possession" as any possession of drugs outside the parameters established in Articles 1(a) and 1(b),

    4. "drug trafficking" as the illicit smuggling and/or distribution of drugs for monetary or other forms of material gain, and

    5. "drug manufacturing" as the illicit production of drugs for monetary or other forms of material gain.

  2. Reaffirms the right of member states to set internal policy regarding drug trafficking, drug manufacturing, illicit drug possession, and the legal distribution and production of drugs, subject to past or future World Assembly resolutions.

  3. Requires that member states, within the bounds of any past World Assembly resolutions;

    1. decriminalize the act of simple drug possession and

    2. initiate a review process to re-evaluate the cases of those imprisoned and/or convicted of the act of simple drug possession in order to determine release and/or pardon eligibility given the following considerations:

      1. the time served for the offense(s),

      2. any separate offenses committed in addition to the act of simple drug possession,

      3. the suitability for re-entry into societal participation,

      4. the likelihood of recidivism in regards to other criminal activities, and

      5. the positive benefits of receiving a full pardon for the act of simple drug possession.

  4. Strongly urges member states to offer full, unconditional releases and/or pardons for those convicted solely for the act of simple drug possession.

Co-authored by Honeydewistania.

This General Assembly resolution was written by Greater Cesnica and Honeydewistania to decriminalize drugs. You can find the drafting thread on the forums here.

The United Regions Alliance recommends that you vote AGAINST the resolution

This resolution decriminalizes simple drug possession of any drug and requires member states to review the status of those imprisoned for simple drug possession. It does not legislate on the legality of producing, distributing or trafficking drugs. While the intent behind decriminalization is well received, the all-encompassing nature of this resolution leaves serious flaws in this resolution. While (to humans) drugs like marijuana are relatively harmless, this resolution also decriminalizes more dangerous drugs. One example is Bath Salts, which can induce paranoia, hallucinations, lower pain reception, violent tendencies etc. which combined can lead to serious harm towards both the user and bystanders; furthermore, long term side effects after repeated use pose their own public health and safety risks. This resolution also does not deal with the important subject of rehabilitation, although rehab will apparently be part of a separate resolution.


The following comments were given during discussion on the LinkURA Discord server:

Mariner Trench voting member Calamari lands wrote,

Calamari lands wrote:I really like this resolution. I think the goal of decriminalization that it seeks is quite noble, while letting specific nations legislate other drug-related issues themselves. Imo, it's well written and it's objective is good. Full support.

Cape of Good Hope resident United states of gondor wrote,

United states of gondor wrote:I support this. Because while I personally don’t want to do drugs, I understand people that do. Especially drugs such as Marijuana, Marijuana has a lot of good benefits; it’s relaxing, it’s a powerful pain-reliever, it does a lot of good, it’s downside is that it’s addicting; but so are phones, and phones provide no health benefit and yet those aren’t outlawed. And the points about charges for illegal possession of drugs or substances or whatever is a valid point as well. Over 40% of drug-related arrests in the US in 2018 was related to Marijuana… the reason I bring Marijuana up specifically is because of how they define “drug”…”drug" as a chemical substance which induces psychoactive effects after being consumed, where such a substance is not already considered legal for recreational consumption or a substance used for recognized medical purposes or otherwise as part of recognized sacramental purposes…” using the term ‘recognized medical purposes’ includes Marijuana and other drugs that have health benefits, but excludes some of the stuff that causes damage than it fixes. I hope some of y’all will vote for it

The Sportsbook voting member Davelands wrote,

Davelands wrote:1a is too broad. If you wanted it to be just Pot, no problem. But if I have created a designer drug that is psychoactive but has terrible side effects (think Heroin or worse) it would also be decriminalized. Not that I want to be a buzzkill (pun intended), I just see that like a lot of proposals, the intention is good but the execution is too broad.

Lands End voting member TESDAI wrote,

TESDAI wrote:Dave brings up a good point. Ok, so I think that while decriminalization of drugs usually is a good idea, I think that 1a is a bit too vague and leaves it open to things like Bath Salts (Monkey Dust), which can very much be a danger to those around the user, and hallucinogens which can cause later unpredictable, lifelong side effects such as HPPD or Flashbacks, which can also be a danger to those around the user, even years after they may have quit using. At that point, I think you stop having the “personal responsibility” discussion, but instead you start entering the realm of public safety.

URA WA Affairs Department Head Scalizagasti wrote,

Scalizagasti wrote:The fact that the WA has many species of sapients also makes the issue of drug control more complex. For instance what if some nation is full of Buman Heings who are killed by marijuana but can consume bath salts like coffee.

Cape of Good Hope voting member Bearded Dragones wrote,

Bearded Dragones wrote:I'm pretty on the fence about this one; I was on board with the concept, and swayed towards against by what you folk brought forth as concerns, but if it only decriminalizes possession, then the manufacturing and distribution of that dangerous stuff would still be illegal, right? Letting WA nations do the Portugal thing and treat consumers as patients rather than criminals, but leaving us still free to regulate the producers/retailers as we see fit. Then again, I believe Portugal also has a clause where if you have over a certain amount of a drug, you need to talk to a doctor about addiction, which this resolution doesn't have.

Former URA Vice President Honeydewistania. who co-authored the resolution, responded,

Honeydewistania wrote:The rehab addiction doctor parts are going to be in a companion resolutions.

Cape of Good Hope resident United states of gondor wrote,

United states of gondor wrote:I was gonna vote yes regardless of what was said here, but after reading some of the arguments, especially the fact that it doesn’t outlaw legitimately dangerous drugs and it doesn’t include rehabilitation, I ended up voting against.

Internal voting results

Turnout: 14/28 members
Weighted turnout: 84.48%


This document was authored by Scalizagasti on behalf of the United Regions Alliance. Please do not reproduce it without permission.

Dalek-empire
Lesser Velutaria
Suvmia
Ktchenia
Gladys and the drowning fish
Bearded Dragones
Duby
Orioni 2
Nordic Royal State
Levont
Marlida
ScotlandSerenity
TESDAI
Calamari lands
Oi Barbaroi
Seludong
Alentejo and Algarve
Noble titans
New Ziah
Quinceria
Niveusium
Draganisia
Orca and Narwhal
The united provinces of north america
Davelands
Highlock
Tuandle
The Independent States of Allied Forces

RawReport