Wealth

Q: Why should I join?
A: Again, prizes, contributing to history, etc.

Q: The political compass? You know that's a bunch of BS.
A: I mean, yeah. I don't think a political compass test is a good measure of your actual opinions and even if it were I don't think it particularly matters. And if you know anything about the test you already know which quadrant we will be heading towards. That being said, it's more about what people say for each question, the rewards, the trophies, the fun. Don't take it too seriously.

Q: Where will I find the results of this?
A: After all the results come in I will work on writing a dispatch. Don't worry everyone involved even in one quiz will be noted in the dispatch to alert you to its presence. It will involve trophies, and results for each sector.

Q: What if a result leads into a tie between two positions?
A: Glad I asked. If I average everything and it's split down the middle, there's an easy fix. I've been voting in each one, and if this does happen I'll just discredit my vote. Easy fix.

Q: Hey idiot, what if I just vote the most left wing positions so I get a trophy?
A: You could try, and I'm not gonna discredit your votes, but keep in mind multiple things. First off, you're not the only person voting. Only one person can get a reward, and it's tabulated by other factors (below). Secondly, you don't know what categories I'm going to use so instead of gambling I'd suggest voting normally.

Q: How do I get the mass telegrams?
A: I'll send you a telegram, you tell me which nation to gift it to and that'll be that.

Q: How do votes get analysed for awards?
A: Well, it's simple. Say we are looking for most left wing. Let's give a position that's left wing. If you strongly agree, thats +2, and if you strongly disagree, that's -1. 0 is for strongly disagreeing and 1 and 0 for agreeing and disagreeing respectively. Inverse this if it's a right wing position. Whomever has the most points wins. Let me note that there are categories that will benefit not having a strongly, so don't think that spamming strongly agree or disagree will help your case. This is an example and it will be different but I think it helps in explaining the basic idea. There will no doubt be situations of similar voting patterns which will come down to how closely this reflects their nation, how long they have been voting and relevant dispatch info to suggest a real similarity.