Post

Informed consent wrote:

We are dealing with people whose bread and butter is the deliberate misinterpretation and misapplication of constitutional law.
Using the 14th as an example, progressives have used it to justify anchor babies despite the fact that the senator who authored the amendment specifically stated in his dissertation that was not the intention.
Government never gives back any authority it accrues by hook or crook, and it is not a question of if, but when that authority is abused.
Not a problem.
Concerned citizens are free to mitigate as they see fit rendering any perceived danger from others moot.

OK, fine. Then as a concerned citizen I claim the right to mitigate the danger from you by shooting you if you come within 50 feet of me.

Do you realize that everything you say about vaccination also applies to drunk driving?! By your own argument you should be free to decide whether or not to put alcohol inside your body before driving, and concerned citizens are free to mitigate as they see fit rendering any perceived danger from you moot.

BTW there's also other way in which you danger others if you unvaccinated. You are much likelier to end up in a hospital, and American hospitals were already overwhelmed in Delta and Omicron waves, resulting in deaths of many people from other causes. Also, for many people Covid is a chronic disease, and I don't want to pay for your treatment for the rest of your life. Somehow I doubt that if you get chronic Covid, you'll follow your professed beliefs and pay for everything out of pocket.