Post

Einswenn wrote:

What I mean is her views were formed not during her term but rather way earlier than that, in other times. As far as I know it (and I may be wrong) she was too conservative for her governing time which once again links it to my point earlier. I might have worded it poorly enough, however I still believe her views were outdated even for late 20th century, not to mention the modern day.

Well, I've no information on when Thatcher formed her social or political views. I don't think she can be described as too conservative for her time. Despite being leader of the Conservative party she was in no sense conservative. Other elements of that party have often been easy to caricature in terms of not rocking the boat of social hierarchy, quiet respectability and cricket on the village green. Her government was a full frontal assault on previous norms. The collapse of heavy industry was painful medicine to be stoicly taken, and unemployed steel workers could either move to Milton Keynes to work in a call-centre or just suck it up. Natural monopolies were broken up and the pieces privatised. Influence held by institutions such as the church, the unions and the media was seen as a challenge to be defeated. Social housing and other public assets were sold at knock-down prices on the grounds that private ownership is inherently better than public. Traditional value was widely supplanted by monetary value. Assess it how you will - she has many admirers to this day - but it was deeply radical and absolutely not the imposition of the values of the 1940s, 50s and 60s.