Probably Cuba. In the modern world I think Cuba is the closets to socialist and the Cuban people are very much in favor of the revolution. Historically, I am not sure.
A) Cuba is pretty neat, although hot take: The absence of awareness of class conflict has made it so Japanese right wing economic policies based on trickle down politics actually work - there is no profit gouging like what we have in western societies, and the companies actually give back to society. You can see this from the speed of reconstruction following its various natural disasters, and by its fairly low homeless levels and low prices. However, said right wing policies also mean cringe social, historical, and foreign policies, removing it from the based list. B) Khmer empire under Jayavarman 7 in 1181 was pretty cool too, given it was effectively a 12th century welfare state - man built 102 hospitals and 121 rest houses alongside highways for travellers. This guy was an unelected monarch, which is obviously bad, but his policies were centuries before his time, especially considering his status.
Phinxia and Sovientia
Falnklands islands
hi!!!
Falnklands islands
I want to ask you a question... whose do you think the malvinas are? from argentina or united kingdom?
Nokhchi-cho
well that's basically like enforcing laws onto people who only pay the police so they can get out, and with that process, there's also bribing in the government and such. It's hard trying to avoid corruption, especially in an authoritarian state.
Liunford
Liunford
uk
Falnklands islands
can you help me? Is that the conflict between the United Kingdom and Argentina is driving me crazy and I want to become a socialist republic, can you help me?
A) Probably the Russian Federation B) Post-perestroitka Soviet Union (1990-1991), this time is extremely cool due to it's politics, but I also feel bad for the people who live then, it was hard
A) Definitely either Laos or Vietnam. Both of whom have some of the fastest growing economies in the world, paired with a core belief in communism. B) When it comes to history most of the nations I would say either still exist (Vietnam, Laos, Cuba, China, etc.) or they are pretty basic like the (Lenin-Stalin) USSR, or Chile under Salvador Allende.
In general most of the nations I like politically (and economically) are based on a form of communism or socialism. However if I was to give a positive vote to a non-socialist nation historically, I’d say that the First Republic of France is pretty cool, in the fact that they freed slaves (until Napoleon reversed that) and they in general sought to generate greater reform than any other nation at the time makes them very cool especially in a world that was very oppressive for the working class.
Let's see it for answer A... Well, it would be Vietnam because of Germany Losing its Status as a Left-Wing Socialdemocracy due to the overtaking of the party by more moderate factions. Vietnam because it is the nearest (but still far) to me politically and economically, it's very close. Answer B... USSR But during the Times of Lenin and Gorbachev (Exclude Gorbachev's economic Failure, this doesn't count, I only mean like on Political Freedoms). Because Honestly, The Only 2 leaders I respect Within the USSR are the above, Lenin Because of His Ideologism and his ideology and Gorbachev for his Pragmatism*. And for Answer B also might be The Polish People's Republic in the years of Edward Gierek, because of What I told like 2000 Pages ago. The PPR at the Time of Gierek was actually very sweet, Nice and Socialist, which went not only with Economic Kick-Start but also with Political Liberalisation (Not the sort you saw in Czechoslovakia in 1969 tho, More moderate transition)
I had to look it up, and I'd say it's either it's own country or British (due to the population being mostly Scottish/Welsh, and its current political standing as a British Overseas Territory), but it would depend on what the population want (edit: they want to be British, so it's British). Unless you don't mean the Falklands Malvinas.
Wiki says Argentina says it's theirs because they "acquired" it from Spain when they got their own independence, and idk what kinda claim that is, as Spain isn't even mentioned as having any claim for the islands.
Stanielle
I think the falklands should be an independent nation even if the pop supports being with the UK because the way it is right now the UK gets to mess around in water they really shouldn’t be in. But yeah it probably shouldn’t be argentina’s because the of the population and the fact that there weren’t any indigenous there before.
Greater lenoland and Kiwansca
Greater lenoland
fair, i do kinda also think that all ex-empire places should just be made independent regardless of their choices, there shouldnt be a category for "part of the british empire but not part of the uk"
Latest Forum Threads