Post

Depending on when you’re referring to me leaving TNP.

First time was August 2007, at the end of my 2007 coup in TNP. After holding out with limited resources and influence after a two month period, I signed an Amnesty Agreement with the opposition, led by Great Bights Mum.

I came back and worked with both the pro and anti coup sides when it came to the Emperor Matthuis incident in October.

I come and go from TNP when I feel it is needed. I was surprisingly elected Delegate of TNP again in 2011, against Flemingovia and Grosseschnauzer. I then gave literally no f*cks part way through and resigned as I had enough.

TNP is a place where it require constant tune-ups. I am proud that the Delegacy is stronger than it was when I was first elected. A Delegate after the NPD in 2005 could not go to the bathroom without Cabinet permission. Sneezing was out of the question.

Do I agree with the direction of the modern TNP? No. I have massive differences of experiences and opinions on how to run a government in the GCRs than their leadership. I have massive disagreement with their overall vision of the world. I don’t quite fear a TNP/WALL led world as much as I do fear whatever it is Sedge wants, but it’s not the way I’d do things.

However - I do genuinely believe that each GCR, feeder or sinker, has its own unique and individual place in game. There’s a reason why each has its own personalities - players have shifted and banded together for some cause and vision. You can’t destroy a GCR, unlike UCRs. Over the years we’ve seen shifts in communities in GCRs and their alignment in NS ideological terms. It’s enough of a struggle to get any excitement anymore in this game and it’d be worse if all the GCRs thought the same.

That being said - Down with sham democracy ala popularity contest. Genuine meritocracy is the best means to organize a society in this game.