CallistaBoard

The elections of the young Italian Duke would mark the end of the Monarchist factualisms. While some fringe groups might have kept fighting, they were all too weak to resist. The Republicans, sensing their defeat imminent now that most of the country was under Monarchist control, would surrender. The Spanish Civil war would end with Amedeo I as King of the Spanish

The H Corporation wrote:

Which makes my claim of this being exaggerated being a lot more true, the suing was done in a heated moment because now that the evidence points otherwise to what Boil claims he is still fervent on making this look like a complete injustice towards him, him and only him. I made it clear my intentions of wanting to be a RP Mod EVEN BEFORE the post was made. The evidence I already put into the table confirms my and Rhen’s innocence in that part.

Since when does it make it more true? You have expressed bias judgement when it comes to this situation.

The H Corporation wrote:

Now lets take a look once again at Rhen’s post before addressing the first part. While the communist takeover was a factor in all of this obviously the casus belli is because of the nationalization of the canal and while my post was taken out of context, which I have apologized for it btw, Boil right here claims it was an advantage however changing ideologies isn’t an advantage, what an advantage should be is a revolution that weakened the Greek state, or a very nitpicked detailed post about the sudden collapse of their economy or something similar, but that’s not the case, the communists or whatever were chosen in a democratic way, while Boil claims the right wing was more popular and that the left-wing was least popular this could have changed during the time Boil switched to another nation, to which its destiny is entirely up by the one who wants to interact with them, there could have been a more detailed post to make the democratic elections of socialists in Greece more reasonable however since it is an NPC nation there is clearly no need for something like that, specially since there is a large period in between Boil switching nations and Rhen RPing his war. And no, we did not do whatever we wanted, we kept it reasonable by just changing its ideology which as I said before it doesn’t change that many things. And there was no need for third party since the discussion did not involved a player but an NPC nation which is Greece.

Do I have to repeat myself over and over again? Just because it wasn't directly the casus belli (which is contrary to what you've said previously and directly), doesn't mean that YOU CAN STILL DO IT. The fact is, you still knowingly abused you power doing something that is unreasonable and unrealistic. Also, the fact is, you never RPED ANYTHING about a change in the political thing. NOBODY DID. Which is what one is SUPPOSED TO DO when rping an NPC nation and changing said NPC nation's ideologies, especially if the situation in the nation is the opposite of what they're going for. And anyway, you still KNOWINGLY did this for an advantage in the war. Who's to say that Greece isn't going to collapse? Greece, being under communists, would most certainly collapse. The large majority of Greece's population is orthodox, and as I've said numerous times, THE CONSERVATIVES WERE RISING IN POPULARITY. WHICH, LIKE IVE JUTS SAID, you never rped any sort of change in the Greek political dynamic, which is what someone is SUPPOSED TO DO. You just went into a straight democratic thingy. You didn't consult me about a change in ideology, you didn't consult whether or not it would be realistic, you just went straight into it. Which confirms that the only reason you did so, was because of an advantage in the war, as you clearly did it in the same post as the war, you clearly wanted Greece isolated in said war, and who's to say that a communist takeover wouldn't collapse Greece, because COMMUNISM ISN'T POPULAR IN GREECE, and YOU NEVER RPED HOW IT WOULD BE POPULAR IN THE FIRST PLACE, thereby making it godmodding and unreasonality, as you did something incredibly unrealistic and unreasonable, avoiding to rp how it even happened in the first place, because you WANTED AN ADVANTAGE.

The H Corporation wrote:

What do you mean Naples was involved? As to right now there are no posts regarding Naples joining and while I have exposed my intentions of declaring war I have not been involved in the war directly nor indirectly as I have not made a post to address the event, so it makes my involvement even less biased than what Boil wants to make us think. The fact that I already showed interest in applying to be a moderator, the lack of rules regarding NPCs makes my and Rhen’s ruling make a lot more sense and that this court case was made because one wasn’t satisfied about the outcome of it. Even though knowingly by switching nations there would be a risk of Greece changing at one point or the other, forget about the war for second, Russia is an example of nations switching and changing the lore of the nation to the point it was unrecognizable, (hopefully NG fixes Russia), from when we started. Punishing a RPer for going to war with an NPC and accussing me of abuse of power even more ridiculous.

You've stated numerous times that you wanted to declare war on Greece. In discord I've seen you discussed it. I also know about the planned partition between You, Russia, and France, because Rhenzern sent me the map. You have stated NUMEROUS TIMES that you wanted this war. Safe to say, you are completly biased in this regard, as the upholding of the post's validity gives you a clear and concise advantage between you, Russia, and France. Therefore, unlike you claim, you are completely and utterly biased in this ruling.

The H Corporation wrote:

Rules are not about morals, its about what’s right and what’s wrong. Failing to enforce the rules is incompetency as a moderator, this is the exact mentality of the NationStates Moderators, should we now go and complain to them because they enforce the rules they have at their disposal? Boil’s post aims to make it look like this is about morals but no one in the history of Moderation have morals ever take a part into enforcing the rules. The lack of rules is not my problem yet Boil continues and continues to put the blame into me when I just enforce the rules. Now thinking I have twisted these rules to my benefit in entirely ridiculous, thinking that I want to abuse power when I have proven time to time otherwise? Even more ludicrous. So far all of y rulings as a Regional Officer, as a defendant of the government have mostly never been challenged ever, because I have all the motives for these rules and while I have had my missteps I have never abused of them and there is no proof other than what Boil claims it to be an abuse of power. Which is not.

You saying that you have 'motives' and don't have 'morals' completely proves my point. You went beyond what an RP moderator is supposed to do, and you completely and utterly abused your power in doing so. There is nothing in the rp rules that states you can do so, yes, but claiming that you are 'enforcing rules' is utterly ridiculous. You are literally abusing your admin power KNOWINGLY, and from your posts, you are clearly implying that you are doing so 'because nothing is mentioned in the rules', like the many posts I linked in my previous arguments. Your claims that 'morals' don't factor into this is also contributing to my argument, as you clearly do not care whether something is right or wrong. You also mentioned that since 'nothing in the rules states anything, that you should stop complaining." thereby, you are clearly and concisely implying that you can do whatever, as long as nothing in the rules states it. You literally abused you power in the process, by making Greece communist without any sort of realism, and you KNOWINGLY did this to gain an advantage, like the many posts that I've linked, that prove what I've said. For instance, you've stated in one of your posts that you did this 'because of the casus belli'. Now, unlike the 'canal' excuse that you claim, you were responding DIRECTLY to a post refrencing Greece's ideology, thereby you were NOT refrencing the canal. Thereby, you have lied in this regard, and therefore I do not believe I can trust you when you state that you are 'upholding the rules' in this regard. Not only this, but in the respective evidence regarding the rules, you state that you KNOWINGLY did so, because the 'rules don't apply, because nothing in the rules says you can'. Thereby, you are DIRECTLY ADMITTING that you can do whatever you want as long as it isn't stated in the rules. Also, is there any evidence that you’ve proven time and time otherwise, other than your words?

The H Corporation wrote:

I will conclude this saying that, the rules were applied, the lack of rules is not a reason for me to invent new rules in the moment or use my morals when making a decision, if I go by morals then I am not being biased, if I don’t go by the rules then its an abuse of power and not usual of an RO, there were no rules twisted, its just what the rules say. Basing this entirely on morals makes Boil a lot more biased than what he wants you to believe. Line by line, word by word, letter by letter, it is clear to me that Boil does not know what a Moderator is, and thus this entire premise is defamatory. The nation is an NPC and no more, no RPers were affected by this so I don’t see any of this to make any sense

'the rules were applied' - there were no rules to begin with. yet you did something KNOWINGLY wrong, you abused your power KNOWINGLY because it WASNT IN THE RULES. Thereby, that makes this arguments invalid.
'the lack of rules is not a reason for me to invent new rules in the moment or use my morals when making a decision' - so you are essentially saying that you can make up new rules whenever you want as rp moderator? an rp moderator doesn't have the authority to make up new rules. are you saying that you could make up a new rule like 'naples is always powerful', and everybody would follow that?
'there were no rules twisted, its just what the rules say' - THERES NOTHING IN THE RULES. Therefore, you CLEARLY abused your power, FROM YOUR OWN POSTS, BECAUES THERE WAS NOTHING IN THE RULES. This is the same excuse that you've been using in the beginning of your argument, which is automatically invald because of the fact that there were NO RULES in the beginning, so you abused your power to make NEW RULES.
' Basing this entirely on morals makes Boil a lot more biased than what he wants you to believe.' - no it doesn't. I'm stating that you abused your power KNOWINGLY, and backing it up with EVIDENCE. that doesn't make me biased.
'it is clear to me that Boil does not know what a Moderator is, and thus this entire premise is defamatory.' - and it is clear that you are unaware that rp moderators aren’t supposed to commit admin abuse. the fact that you are claiming this is defamatory. you were appointed only recently by rhen, so you do not have the authority to claim whether or not I know what a moderator is. the fact is, you abused your power, so i think this argument is invalid, due to the fact that you abused your power as an rp moderator. it is not your authority to decide whether or not I know that.
'the nation is an npc and no more'. just because its an npc nation, doesn't mean you can do whatever you want of it. this basically sets the precedent that one can do whatever they want to npc nations, which is an extremely unhealthy precedent.