NATION

PASSWORD

Post

Region: Callista

Messages

The République Barltave of Barlyy

Churchill 1 wrote:Barlyy, as you can see, this is an example of an interruption in a conversation. Yet it's ok.

I know, that's why it's getting suppressed and SPLEENS warned.

I was sleeping. Jesus.

Churchill 1 wrote:Yes, but I read it. And the thing is, I did not know that it was illegal. I knew that single word posts were illegal, as well as the other rules, and I respected that. Why don't you put it in then, eh? If you argue that you didn't, I know that I only had one warning left, but you did not clearly state that warning, showing that it was not properly jurisdicted as a formal law. If you're so serious about rules, list them out.

We will put "don't spam a word again and again" as a rule. BUT, that does not mean your post is safe. It STILL violates the "pointless" rule.

Churchill 1 wrote:I did an RMB search, and you never clearly stated that rule. If you didn't state it, then it doesn't count.

If you use moral excuses for everything, then stop stating the formal rules and move on to moral rules.

WE. DID.

Stop talking about the repeated use. We are talking about the "pointlessness" rule. It's not "moral rules", it is very much formal.

Churchill 1 wrote:Barlyy if you think about it and ponder it some more, morally correct decisions for the collective good, if ever used, will be beneficial, straying from the already preestablished rules and customs. However, morally correct decisions made for small misdemeanors and trouble that could easily be enforced via rules are simply not logical. While, sure, you could spend an entire hour sentimentally talking to a nation about how his single word post could kill the entire universe, it could be easily added into the rules, as it is a commonly mistaken and enforced rule. If you do want this minor abrasion of the rules to be harshly punished for no reason, I see it as a fault of you, that you have not correctly stated it in any blatant way, making it not legal. You can't really argue with the moral side of this, as most people would've just ignored the post and moved on, the only effector being [nation]Caedmare[nation], who I responded to. As I previously stated (as well), your ban announcement actually caused more damage to the efficiency of the RMB. If you are criticizing my wrongings, consider yours instead.
As this states, sometimes being too overprotective of a certain subject can lead to its death. Your case. Take it or leave it.

Aand more filler. Just what I expected.

This is NOT about morality. Your post very much violated formal rules.

Well, one word posts are on the dispatch. Stop talking about stuff that you have no proof to back up.

You have literally violated the rules 10 times. That's not a "minor mishap".

"Efficiency of the RMB"? What the hell does that even mean? If you're talking about activity, like I have stated before, I do not want filler posts to be considered "activity". They're Schrödinger's posts, they exist and don't exist at the same time. I'd rather kill the RMB than to allow people to break rules.

Your regions "died" of strict rules, BCK died because of voter fraud and people not wanting so much spam. I would rather kill this region than to allow another BCK.

I will cling onto my past, thank you very much. I've learned from my past. What caused what. I know that, because I am partially stuck in my past. I'm not "clinging onto a rock" just because 5 guys are spamming. You don't have any rights here.

Your liberties end where others' begin. So quit with your "strict rules!!! literally 1984" arguments.

ContextReport