Messages Mireos 1 year 305 days ago
Bistritza wrote: Probably a constitution, it's a good way to set a frame for yourself. This constitution for example, explains the nation in enough detail to everyone, while it sets the BASE of what to further elaborate on in other factbooks.I'll try to work on one, See what i can do
The Republic of The free romanians 1 year 305 days ago
Lazy but still have to work on wholesome communal orthodox theocracy
Nusapasim 1 year 305 days ago The North Pacific
British Bharat wrote:good thanks, I'd like to open an embassy good thank you, and how are you?
I'm also doing fine and busy with these factbooks.
I'm not opening up for embassies yet. And even if so, the lore needs to be able to fit in the canon well.
The Snarky Space Penguin of Trivalve 1 year 305 days ago
British Bharat wrote: I always hide under tables good thanks, I'd like to open an embassy good thank you, and how are you?Yeah I am going relatively well
Mireos 1 year 305 days ago Edited
Bistritza wrote: Starting with laws instead of military is a very based decision. Most new nations end up cringe , working on military factbooks which have no basis on their stats.Well, considering Nationstates tells me I am a liberal scandinavian Paradise... I don't think I'll be working on the military for a while. Legislation and History...Maybe geography
Mireos 1 year 305 days ago
Bistritza wrote: If you're interested, your military stats can be found here: Defense forces , Arms manufacturing , Patriotism , Weaponization As for the category you've mentioned, they depend on the main 3 stats shown below it (civil rights, economy, political freedoms).Thanks, well. i just looked at the three of them... I'm at the lowest ranks in all of them, weaponization being the highest. lol
The Confederazione of Ammar and Casentino 1 year 305 days ago Edited
But you didn't have to cut me off!
The free romanians wrote: Lazy but still have to work on wholesome communal orthodox theocracy
respecc *beats chest in Ammar and Casentino Federation.*
The Republic of The free romanians 1 year 305 days ago
Kolozsvár??? 🤢🤮🤮
Municipium Aelium Hadrianum Napocensium 😎😏🥵✔
The Dominion of Drystar 1 year 305 days ago
Monaque wrote: I declare warWhy?
Click to show... For all those asking, this is no ordinary poll. Basically a group of people have decided that there are huge problems with our current forms of government and the only way to fix it is a complete overhaul. I highly suggest you read https://tspforums.xyz/thread-10392.html.
Now, why I oppose it. I’ve tried writing this part several times, I just can’t word it accurately to express my distaste for this current idea. We just recently had a big argument over if the assembly should do away with the office of LC and replace it with offsite appointed moderators. Mind you, they wanted to remove the everyday users ability to choose their local government from them and impose people appointed to control the rmb. In fact the LC and DC are trying to expand how the local council works because of this. https://tspforums.xyz/thread-10385.html
Needless to say, that wasn’t an enjoyable experience. Now we get this call for a Grand Council, to reform and rewrite the Charter. Now some of the backers of the previous position to do away with the LC are pushing this. I find it more then likely that since they couldn’t get it passed as a stand alone, they’ll come gunning for the entire LC structure under the idea of reform without the gameside getting a say at all.
I’d like to think the people proposing this have our best interests at heart, but life has taught me that’s just not a thing. So I have to say I won’t vote yes on them calling a Grand Council with unlimited abilities to change anything and everything.
Do forgive me if I don’t get my idea across. Please feel free to ask me more, or discuss it here on the rmb.
The Snarky Space Penguin of Trivalve 1 year 305 days ago
Drystar wrote:Click to show... For all those asking, this is no ordinary poll. Basically a group of people have decided that there are huge problems with our current forms of government and the only way to fix it is a complete overhaul. I highly suggest you read https://tspforums.xyz/thread-10392.html.
Now, why I oppose it. I’ve tried writing this part several times, I just can’t word it accurately to express my distaste for this current idea. We just recently had a big argument over if the assembly should do away with the office of LC and replace it with offsite appointed moderators. Mind you, they wanted to remove the everyday users ability to choose their local government from them and impose people appointed to control the rmb. In fact the LC and DC are trying to expand how the local council works because of this. https://tspforums.xyz/thread-10385.html
Needless to say, that wasn’t an enjoyable experience. Now we get this call for a Grand Council, to reform and rewrite the Charter. Now some of the backers of the previous position to do away with the LC are pushing this. I find it more then likely that since they couldn’t get it passed as a stand alone, they’ll come gunning for the entire LC structure under the idea of reform without the gameside getting a say at all.
I’d like to think the people proposing this have our best interests at heart, but life has taught me that’s just not a thing. So I have to say I won’t vote yes on them calling a Grand Council with unlimited abilities to change anything and everything.
Do forgive me if I don’t get my idea across. Please feel free to ask me more, or discuss it here on the rmb.
The great council goes against the majority of the democratic values that our government strive themselves on. By instating this, they would be throwing all of this hard work in the bin and disgracing the democratic title given to us. All because a small minority of nations didn't get what they wanted. Further more, majority of them have no involvement in the RMB so they feel that it would be safer to attack us rather then suggest a reform on the forum side. I believe a forum side reform would work much better because the amount of corruption reeking from them is a disgrace to The South Pacific and the people that built it to what it was.
The Republic of The free romanians 1 year 305 days ago
New Xartoia wrote: Guys I'm doing flags of games but they turned communist (Dictators : No Peace, Nationstates, Roblox and Minecraft have been done)GIVE ME IDEAS!!!!!!!!!! Don't
The Best Nation in the World of Orcuo 1 year 305 days ago
Drystar wrote:Click to show... For all those asking, this is no ordinary poll. Basically a group of people have decided that there are huge problems with our current forms of government and the only way to fix it is a complete overhaul. I highly suggest you read https://tspforums.xyz/thread-10392.html.
Now, why I oppose it. I’ve tried writing this part several times, I just can’t word it accurately to express my distaste for this current idea. We just recently had a big argument over if the assembly should do away with the office of LC and replace it with offsite appointed moderators. Mind you, they wanted to remove the everyday users ability to choose their local government from them and impose people appointed to control the rmb. In fact the LC and DC are trying to expand how the local council works because of this. https://tspforums.xyz/thread-10385.html
Needless to say, that wasn’t an enjoyable experience. Now we get this call for a Grand Council, to reform and rewrite the Charter. Now some of the backers of the previous position to do away with the LC are pushing this. I find it more then likely that since they couldn’t get it passed as a stand alone, they’ll come gunning for the entire LC structure under the idea of reform without the gameside getting a say at all.
I’d like to think the people proposing this have our best interests at heart, but life has taught me that’s just not a thing. So I have to say I won’t vote yes on them calling a Grand Council with unlimited abilities to change anything and everything.
Do forgive me if I don’t get my idea across. Please feel free to ask me more, or discuss it here on the rmb.
So a GC is the literally definition of a Totalitarian Dictator
The Confederacy of Los estados confederates de Mexico 1 year 305 days ago
Bistritza wrote: Xar, 10-3 please. - Chat you should know that you have voting rights on LC and the delegate, before [a certain person] suddenly appears and tries to convince you otherwise. Any proposal attempting to remove LC or the delegate or ''reform'' how they are chosen should concern you. The result of these proposals is less freedom, before [another person] suddenly appears and tries to convince you otherwise. I'll try to inform you if another proposal to ''reform the LC'' is put to vote, since the last time this was done - it was ignored, passed and then everyone including the Chair was surprised. - As for GC, vote as you wish.I see you're learning the 10 codes, that's a big 10-4 I'll tell you that much
Trivalve wrote: The great council goes against the majority of the democratic values that our government strive themselves on. By instating this, they would be throwing all of this hard work in the bin and disgracing the democratic title given to us. All because a small minority of nations didn't get what they wanted. Further more, majority of them have no involvement in the RMB so they feel that it would be safer to attack us rather then suggest a reform on the forum side. I believe a forum side reform would work much better because the amount of corruption reeking from them is a disgrace to The South Pacific and the people that built it to what it was.It's like I was talking to Canada on the LC/DC chat, if LCs no longer become an elected position, they'll just disband the DC after 1 run and that's just plain idiotic, sooner or later we'll have people as LCs that either don't know about the rules and can't do their job, or they'll have an iron fist over TSP which would make TWP look very Leiniant
The Dominion of Drystar 1 year 305 days ago
Orcuo wrote: So a GC is the literally definition of a Totalitarian Dictator
No, it’s a bit more involved then that. Think of it as the tyranny of the minority vs the majority.
The Snarky Space Penguin of Trivalve 1 year 305 days ago
Los estados confederates de Mexico wrote: I see you're learning the 10 codes, that's a big 10-4 I'll tell you that muchIt's like I was talking to Canada on the LC/DC chat, if LCs no longer become an elected position, they'll just disband the DC after 1 run and that's just plain idiotic, sooner or later we'll have people as LCs that either don't know about the rules and can't do their job, or they'll have an iron fist over TSP which would make TWP look very Leiniant
It's just a sad attempt to get more control
The Best Nation in the World of Orcuo 1 year 305 days ago
Drystar wrote: No, it’s a bit more involved then that. Think of it as the tyranny of the minority vs the majority.Near Either way am not voting for this GC crap because I generally hate the idea of one person at the top making all the rules
The Confederacy of Los estados confederates de Mexico 1 year 305 days ago
Orcuo wrote: So a GC is the literally definition of a Totalitarian Dictator If I had to give a classification to the GC, it'd be this Civil rights: rare Economy: developing Political freedom: excellent
Total classification: "Authoritarian Democracy"
Trivalve wrote: It's just a sad attempt to get more controlI wouldn't be surprised if all the gameside folks got up in arms over this, we'd basically might as well end up with a 1-87
Ardenswije 1 year 305 days ago
New Xartoia wrote: Guys I'm doing flags of games but they turned communist (Dictators : No Peace, Nationstates, Roblox and Minecraft have been done)GIVE ME IDEAS!!!!!!!!!! F1 22 (Codemasters)