CallistaBoard

Nooooooooooooooo wrote:

I am the candidate

Also isn't that technically illegal since you do not hold lawful residency in Callista

Yazakhastan wrote:

Also isn't that technically illegal since you do not hold lawful residency in Callista

I am a citizen, Mushroom Gorge will be running

Nooooooooooooooo wrote:

I am a citizen

But you do not reside in Callista. It is therefore the former interim justice pro-Tempore's ruling, that by moving to another region or founding another region, you have renounced your Callistan Citizenship, as there is no such law in the code of citizenship in the regional constitution.

Nooooooooooooooo wrote:

I am a citizen, Mushroom Gorge will be running

I intend to challenge that in court. The Dream of Kirby

guys Barlyy is technoblade!!!!!

Salty Yazakh

Nooooooooooooooo wrote:

guys Barlyy is technoblade!!!!!

hardly, just trying to maintain the legality of any movement by a political opponent.

Yazakhastan wrote:

hardly, just trying to maintain the legality of any movement by a political opponent.

Also, the office of the PM and Regional delegate needs to be separate offices, which is giving too much power to the PM
Baloo Kingdom

how to troll Barlyy:
1. Speak Spanish

Yazakhastan wrote:

Also, the office of the PM and Regional delegate needs to be separate offices, which is giving too much power to the PM
Baloo Kingdom

Stop with these dumb proposals. You're like Socrates: arguing for the sake of arguing.

Barlyy wrote:

Stop with these dumb proposals. You're like Socrates: arguing for the sake of arguing.

these are hardly stupid proposals, this is trying to ensure a more democratic and decentralized region.

Yazakhastan wrote:

these are hardly stupid proposals, this is trying to ensure a more democratic and decentralized region.

Decentralization is pointless

A while back me and Rome talked about having a Bill of Rights as part of our political campaign, and the conclusion we arrived to was that it served no real purposes. Rights are already guaranteed nor are they under any threat, a Bill of Rights would just be something for the sake of something, something without actual purpose.

Yazakhastan wrote:

Also, the office of the PM and Regional delegate needs to be separate offices, which is giving too much power to the PM
Baloo Kingdom

I bet I could count on my fingers how many times someone here has actually cared about WA decisions, this serves no purpose.

Ethics Committee of the SCPF wrote:

I bet I could count on my fingers how many times someone here has actually cared about WA decisions[...]

We got quorum raided once. I think that was the only time we cared. Munie cares a lot though

Ethics Committee of the SCPF wrote:

A while back me and Rome talked about having a Bill of Rights as part of our political campaign, and the conclusion we arrived to was that it served no real purposes. Rights are already guaranteed nor are they under any threat, a Bill of Rights would just be something for the sake of something, something without actual purpose.

A good point, however, there needs to at least be an assurance of rights, as I have known some regional leaders and governments to become increasingly oppressive, even to the point of locking their regions down to prevent nations from leaving.

Yazakhastan wrote:

A good point, however, there needs to at least be an assurance of rights, as I have known some regional leaders and governments to become increasingly oppressive, even to the point of locking their regions down to prevent nations from leaving.

The options I see are either
1) We institute laws within our constitution that relay the specific duties of the government members, and the limits on their offices.
2) We create a formal bill of assurances

Yazakhastan wrote:

A good point, however, there needs to at least be an assurance of rights, as I have known some regional leaders and governments to become increasingly oppressive, even to the point of locking their regions down to prevent nations from leaving.

Citizens already have rights

Yazakhastan wrote:

A good point, however, there needs to at least be an assurance of rights, as I have known some regional leaders and governments to become increasingly oppressive, even to the point of locking their regions down to prevent nations from leaving.

1. Constitution is there

2. Good thing we aren’t them and have known eachother for a good amount of time, I doubt that would happen and if it did then we can continue to live on through successor regions like we did before.

Yazakhastan wrote:

The options I see are either
1) We institute laws within our constitution that relay the specific duties of the government members, and the limits on their offices.
2) We create a formal bill of assurances

That literally is already in the constitution, pls read.

Ffs please read §4 of the constitution

Ethics Committee of the SCPF wrote:

1. Constitution is there

2. Good thing we aren’t them and have known eachother for a good amount of time, I doubt that would happen and if it did then we can continue to live on through successor regions like we did before.

There are several threats at this present moment that I see to the regional government,
1) Radicalism
2) Voter Apathy
3) Apathy within the government to move the region foward.

Yazakhastan wrote:

There are several threats at this present moment that I see to the regional government,
1) Radicalism
2) Voter Apathy
3) Apathy within the government to move the region foward.

Radicalism?? Says the one who wants to force everyone to join his party?

Yazakhastan wrote:

There are several threats at this present moment that I see to the regional government,
1) Radicalism
2) Voter Apathy
3) Apathy within the government to move the region foward.

Apathy literally happens every time the elections aren’t near, no surprise people don’t talk about politics as much when nothing is happening in politics.

Barlyy wrote:

Radicalism?? Says the one who wants to force everyone to join his party?

That was rescinded by the leadership of the OPC, and therefore is null.