(The Church of Crymenathea teaches three basic tenets: that all men are created equal, that all religions are lies perpetuated by Argus the Despoiler, and that technological progress will lead to humanity's ascension.
Progress requires intelligence, and these people clearly did not have such if they thought it was a good idea to reside in a country that explicitly broke rule one, and implicitly broke rule two. If Pano did come to rescue us all, those neanderthals probably wouldn't be among those to ascend.)
i did that because he didnt have military access and the border between him and ancap wasnt a full quad point unless this something else then ignore me
General Attacks - Legal If another nation attacks you via military force, it is legal to go to war with them. Other cases of attacks, such as cyber-attacks, may require review.
According to the casus belli dispatch, there are no restrictions on military actions done on another nation, but it will always grant the affected nation a reason to go to war right now or in the future.
A general attack would constitute any invasion or other use of force by the military or hired group(s) against another force/political entity without a prior reason for war and with clear intent to harm or hinder.
At least, that's how I would define it. Under that pretext, anything from the entrance of a soldier who shoots another soldier from another nation, to the deliberate invasion of a nation to give the other side casus belli, and anything in between, counts as a general attack and so gives casus belli it's victim.
(Fair, however most of them simply didn’t have any way to leave. Once Adrianus showed his true intentions, and declared the Republic of Orientemia, travel would realistically be closed off. Otherwise the entire idea would fail pretty quickly. I’m aware I didn’t RP it, which was of course my mistake, but I was simply focusing on setting down the ground rules of Kastellism first.)
(We don't know that. As far as Casablanca, and specifically the militaristic Cainite faction is concerned, those people opted to remain in a racist state and only got what they deserved.)
I wouldn't say officially. They could most definitely occupy and thereby technically administrate, but officially speaking it would still be another country's land.
Kind of like how Daesh administrated land in Syria and Iraq but never officially owned it, with recognition backing it.
Except none of this involves radical terrorist organizations in the Middle East. I think.
Ehhh... the common "routine" is for war to be formally declared, and the result of said war will then determine concessions. However, if they occupy land and said land is not negotiated upon, one of two things can happen. The first is that the territory continues to be treated as occupied, and the second is that the territory is treated as land annexed into the invader's country. Usually, the second happens when the invaded nation makes no real effort to, or gives up on attempting to reclaim their occupied lands.
Latest Forum Threads